The single-center retrospective study covered 105 adult patients who
underwent posterior instrumented fusion of at least three cervical
motion segments including the C7 vertebra. There were 76 patients who
had at least one-year follow-up and 54 patients who had fusions that
crossed the cervicothoracic juncture with the lowest instrumented
vertebra at the thoracic spine.
The researchers found:
1. The reoperation rate wasn't significantly different between the two cohorts. There were only two patients who had C7-LIV surgery who required distal extension of their fusions — 9 percent.
2. The blood loss was significantly greater for T-LIV patients — 279 mL — compared to the C7-LIV patients — 173 mL.
3. The operative time was greater for T-LIV patients, 268 minutes, when compared with the C7-LIV patients, 234 minutes.
4. The complication rate was 20 percent greater in the T-LIV cohort than in the C7-LIV cohort, but this wasn't considered significant.
5. Stopping fusions at C7 didn't increase the risk for subsequent reoperation compared with fusions crossing the cervicothoracic junction, and it led to less blood loss, the study authors concluded.
view source :- beckersspine
1. The reoperation rate wasn't significantly different between the two cohorts. There were only two patients who had C7-LIV surgery who required distal extension of their fusions — 9 percent.
2. The blood loss was significantly greater for T-LIV patients — 279 mL — compared to the C7-LIV patients — 173 mL.
3. The operative time was greater for T-LIV patients, 268 minutes, when compared with the C7-LIV patients, 234 minutes.
4. The complication rate was 20 percent greater in the T-LIV cohort than in the C7-LIV cohort, but this wasn't considered significant.
5. Stopping fusions at C7 didn't increase the risk for subsequent reoperation compared with fusions crossing the cervicothoracic junction, and it led to less blood loss, the study authors concluded.
view source :- beckersspine
.png)
0 comments:
Post a Comment